
- Astroguider vs phd2 drivers#
- Astroguider vs phd2 driver#
- Astroguider vs phd2 pro#
- Astroguider vs phd2 Pc#
In case you were curious, here are the phd2 reasons to use ASCOM pulse guiding.ġ) A drastic reduction in the number of re-calibrations you'll need to perform. With an ASCOM connection to the mount, PHD2 is aware of target declinations, and can easily make the calculations necessary to adjust for the converging RA lines. With ST-4, there is no direct connection to the mount, so it has no knowledge of its target coordinates. PHD2 can only adjust for this effect if it knows the declination of the mount's targets.

The opposite would be true if you calibrated at high declination and then slewed to a low declination: it would overcontrol wildly. But without recalibration, PHD2 does not know that a larger correction is required. The same movement at 69 degrees (the dec of M82), because of the converging lines of RA, is many more arcseconds, and therefore requires a much larger correction. However, if you calibrate at M42 and then slew to M82, you will probably find that it is not sufficiently sensitive in RA.Ī movement of one pixel at 5 degrees (the dec of M42) is only a few arcseconds (or fraction thereof) of RA and requires only a small correction. If your range of target declinations is not too large, it will likely work tolerably well. Hum, strange, I use the ST-4 port and only cal once a night, usually near my nightly alignment star. With ST-4, you have to recalibrate every time you slew to a new target. Sorry, but I'm just not quite sure how it all works just yet. Will PHD2 be able to send the guiding signals through the USB as well or will PHD2 issue those commands through APT?
Astroguider vs phd2 Pc#
I have my mount connected to my PC anyway and I'm using APT to control everything. If I'm reading the guide correctly, PHD2 will send the guiding signals through the USB port that I already have connected and I won't need the ST-4 cable at all. After reading the user guide I'm thinking that the Skywatcher ASCOM selection would be best.
Astroguider vs phd2 pro#
I'm pretty sure this is supposed to run from my camera to the "guide" port on my EQ6-R Pro which I think 2 or 3 feet of cable would suffice.Īnyway, after installing PHD2 and running the set up under "mount selection" there are a few options. This port also powers the camera (no additional power cable).Īlso included is a ridiculously long (15 ft) ST-4 cable. The camera has a mini USB port and cable that connects to my laptop. To run AstroGuider you need Apple Mac running macOS Sierra or later.I'm brand new to guiding and just bought my first guiding set-up. If you want to use AstroImager, AstroGuider and AstroTelescope, you can consider All-in-One INDIGO A1 instead.
Astroguider vs phd2 driver#
NexStar mount driver (supports Celestron and Skywatcher dialects),.

LX200 mount driver (supports Meade, PegasusAstro NYX-101, Avalon StarGo/StarGo2, Losmandy Gemini, 10micron, EQMac, Astro-Physics GTO and OnStep dialects),.EQMac guider driver (obsoleted on macOS Mojave),.

Astroguider vs phd2 drivers#
